Vandalism,
litter and graffiti
One
of the most shameful of our current social crimes is vandalism because it has no motive and there is no gain for the perpetrators. Those who are responsible for the wilful damage of personal or public property are often unable to give an explanation as to why they target a particular building or edifice other than that it happens to be there when they are in a destructive mood and often fired by strong drink. The morose and sullen reply by the guilty when asked to clarify their conduct is usually an inane retort that reflects their mindless stupidity because even they have little idea why they should roam the locality wrecking everything in sight although remorse for their actions is invariably sadly lacking.
The Vandals of history were a Teutonic people related to the Goths and in the 5th century they moved from North Germany to invade Roman Gaul and Spain, and after much bloodshed many settled in Andalusia and others reaching North Africa. They occupied Rome in the year 455 AD and plundered the city, despoiling it of its treasures of art and literature, but a century later accepted Roman suzerainty and thus ended the history of this independent tribe. The name has since been used for those who wilfully or ignorantly indulge in the destruction of works of art and is now applied to most forms of wanton damage.
The causing of malicious damage during civil demonstrations against government and state has frequently been justified as the means for the cause and that is arguable but the indiscriminate destruction of property for no apparent reason is inexcusable and this is at the heart of the matter.
Bourne has much the same problem with vandalism as most other towns and cities in Britain but being of modest size, serious cases of criminal damage are more noticeable and receive greater publicity. In recent years, there have been a number of attempts to burn down the pavilion headquarters of the Bourne Town Football Club on the Abbey Lawn while the pitch at the adjoining Bourne Cricket Club has been damaged on several occasions. Smashed windows occur in the town most weekends and new graffiti appears on walls and hoardings almost daily.

|
The old wooden
street signs mounted on posts were an easy target for vandals
(above) and so South Kesteven District Council began using
galvanised replacements concreted into the ground but these seemed
to provide a challenge for the culprits because they were also
attacked and with some force (right). |

|
In March 2001, vandals systematically attacked road signs around the town, mainly in the North Road area where half a dozen were wrecked over one weekend. Over the Bank Holiday weekend in August 2002, the telephone kiosk in North Road was wrecked by vandals using an estate agent's sign that had been uprooted from a nearby front garden as a battering ram. The town centre was littered with rubbish and broken glass with West Street being particularly affected on Sunday and Monday mornings, the pavements and gutters filled with the debris from a weekend's holiday and not a street cleaner in sight. It looked as though a loaded dustcart had driven through in a gale force wind, scattering litter as it went.
In September 2002, one of the council rubbish bins in Queen's Road was reduced to a pile of mangled metal, a feat that must have taken some combined strength. There was also more vandalism at the junction of Queen's Road with Harrington Street, a favourite spot for many people to sit down on the public bench which had been systematically wrecked, leaving only one section of wooden slats and the metal upright.
The following month, the telephone kiosk in North Road was wrecked for a second time together with another round the corner in
Northfields.
TELEPHONE
BOXES TARGETED |

Photo: Courtesy Bob Pearson
|
Telephone kiosks
have been a particular target for vandals in Bourne. The
box above in North Road was wrecked three times, firstly during the August Bank Holiday
weekend in 2002 and after being repaired by British Telecom, it
was damaged again the following month (below left) and again in
September 2003 when a traffic cone was used as a battering ram
(bottom picture). Another kiosk round the corner in Northfields
was also vandalised in September 2002 (below right). The damage
became so repetitive at kiosks throughout the town that in 2004,
British Telecom began to phase them out, a decision also
influenced by the widespread use of mobile phones Estate
agents' signs are also repeatedly damaged and rarely a weekend
goes by without one or two being ripped up and tossed around the
road, or even worse, as is illustrated above. |

|

|
 |
Public toilets are a particular target for vandals and a small block of conveniences for both ladies and gents on the edge of the playing fields in Recreation Road was closed down in 1998 because of continuing criminal damage. Basins were regularly ripped from the walls, the lavatories broken and young couples were often found there having sex. The building has since been leased to Bourne Town Junior Football Club for storage purposes at a peppercorn rent of £1 a week.
The public toilets in South Street were also closed by South Kesteven District Council in October 2002 with little likelihood of them being re-opened because of vandalism while a third block of conveniences at the town's bus station were also badly damaged within days of them being renovated.
Trees
are another favourite target and in recent months, four saplings planted
along the verge in North Road by the town's Rotary Club as their
contribution to the environment have been snapped off at the base, and are
therefore irrecoverable, while in Recreation Road, a tree was even
uprooted and left lying at the roadside.
Few people in Bourne think very much about vandalism unless it happens to them and, as with other towns and cities throughout Britain, because much of it is directed towards the town centre. If their own garden fence were torn down, hanging baskets proudly displayed at the front of the house thrown into the road, the paintwork of cars standing in the driveway defaced with sharp metal objects, windows smashed and graffiti spray-painted over the brickwork, then they would demand action, firstly from the police who would not respond because vandalism is a low priority, and then from their Neighbourhood Watch group, if there was one, who would be powerless anyway.
Anti-social behaviour causes pain, discomfort and damage to other people and their property and the following contribution was submitted to the Bourne Internet web site in June 2002. The author was anonymous but gave a heartfelt and graphic description of life in an area of Bourne where vandalism was allowed to reign unchecked:
VANDALISM
- A PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
If vandalism is being perpetrated and those responsible are not being caught and prosecuted, then it must be out of control. Causing criminal damage is not the problem of elsewhere. It is our problem too. The only level to be happy with is where it is not taking place at all. Gangs of youths roaming free of supervision at the Abbey Lawns or wherever are well placed to cause trouble. The vandalism there has been a regular feature for each of the past seven or eight summers and yet as far as I know no one has been brought to account.
Those who suggest that victims of vandalism who become exasperated are being negative are either not property owners or have had little or no trouble from this practice. They also sound remarkably like some in our criminal justice system who have decided on our behalf that criminal damage is a minor offence - a crime that the victims of which should easily be able to cope with. In the 17 years that I lived in one Bourne property we only had one egg thrown at a living room window. Then I moved to another Bourne location in the early 1990s where it was hell. Youths would congregate next to my home for most hours of each and every day April - September and I suffered about 50 acts of vandalism and theft each of the 1993 to 1995 summers. They uprooted plants, kicked in fence panels, stole fish from my pond, hack sawed through chain locks on my side gate, banged on my dining room window and front door, threw stones, mud and water bombs at the front and back of my house. They climbed my trees and broke branches off them and threw them onto my dining room roof. They also threw lighted paper into my back garden and attempted to set fire to my more established shrubs at the front. Trespass was a daily problem.
Initially I tapped on my window to tell them to get off my property. Although I then managed to befriend some of them, the trouble continued. So I ended up talking to some to their parents who I found to be even more disagreeable than their offspring. The police said that there was little that they could do. Other property owners suffered similarly - especially when the kids obtained catapults to continue firing projectiles that included golf balls. I'd go out and not be too sure what state my property would be in when I returned. Or when I was at home and could hear them outside I'd be waiting for something to happen. It would have been interesting to see how others would have reacted in my situation.
You are more or less on your own - they knew that they could do more or less what they wanted and the police would do nothing. And yet despite the summers of misery, I only had to touch one of them - cause them the slightest of bruising and police and parents would have been round in a flash and it would have been me in trouble because I was supposed to be able to accept having my home
vandalised. This is what happened to a neighbour across the way. One of the youths picked up a rock and ran it along the side of his car and then started throwing lumps of concrete through his open kitchen door. He got hold of the youth by the collar and brought him to his enraged face. That is all he did and yet the youth's parents reported him, the police became involved and he was bound over to keep the peace for six months.
A change in my neighbourhood's environment caused the troubles to disappear in 1996 and since then I'd not want to live anywhere else. It was the regularity of the troubles rather than their extent that was the problem for me. In fact it was almost surprising that no windows were broken and no attempt was made to break into my house. I'm not sure that if they had whether the police would then have acted. The youths who attracted their friends to the area have moved out and been replaced by families with some absolutely terrific kids. The sort who knock on my door, yes, but only to ask if they can get their ball back. A different world - the whole neighbourhood is better for the people that now live in it.
It's highly interesting to note that three of the five or six culprits have since appeared several times in the magistrate's court. One for breaking into a pub at Stamford and more recently for drink driving, another for assault, and another for possession of drugs. My neighbourhood's problems never reached the local papers so you cannot rely solely on the media to inform you fully of what is going on. It also highlights why I can understand those who did not and don't wish to see skateboard parks built close to their homes. If I was a town planner it would not be just industry that I would section off from residential areas but also facilities for youths. Even in London youths complain about a lack of facilities. It just amazes me that crime, particularly youth crime, is not always at the top of the political agenda. Transport will eventually get you to work, the NHS will eventually provide you treatment, and most children receive a good education. But our criminal justice system provides little deterrent or rehabilitation for those criminally inclined. Nobody, anywhere it seems, has a clue on how to alter somebody's behaviour to make him or her a better citizen. |
Vandalism is not new. It has always been with us but the problem has been aggravated in recent years because the culprits are less likely to be caught and punished, mainly because the police take little interest and rarely even turn out to investigate. The threat of prosecution, an appearance before the courts and a suitable punishment, would lead to a subsequent stigmatisation by family and society that would work wonders in focussing the minds of those contemplating smashing up public or private property just for the fun of it.
Litter is also a continuing problem in Bourne and a survey by the Keep Britain Tidy campaign in October 2002 decided that we were still a nation of litterbugs. The results indicated that 25 million tonnes of rubbish were dropped in the streets and other public places of Britain every year, making the country look a mess and costing a fortune to clear up. Changes in the way we live seem to be exacerbating the problem because more packaged food is eaten in the street, more people chew gum and the majority have lost the habit of using a bin. Poor planning of cleaning and refuse collections are making the problem worse and street sweeping fails to collect all of the dust and soil in the gutters and so allows weeds to grow. The proliferation of fast food shops in Bourne has proved to be a particular source of street rubbish.

|

|
Litter at the town end of Wherry's Lane, photographed
in February 2003 (above),
and (below) in the town centre, almost outside the Town Hall, in April
2003.
|
But headway is being made in some places although it is doubtful if we will ever be as clean as Singapore for instance, where anyone who drops litter faces a £1,000 fine plus community service, or Dubai, where the streets are among the world's cleanest.
The Keep Britain Tidy survey was carried out at 11,000 sites across 54 boroughs in England and Bourne was included in the East Midlands region which was assessed as follows:
Obstructions on pavements were causing problems and were rated poor. Councils here were good at cleaning toilets and removing fly posting, graffiti and leaves. The region looked after lamp-posts better than anyone else - getting them a satisfactory grade. They were also okay on cleaning the pavements outside public lavatories and removing weeds. But everything from clearing up litter to looking after bins was graded unsatisfactory.

The bus shelter opposite the old peoples'
homes in Manning Road
after it was vandalised in March 2003.
Individual towns were not named in the survey but a simple check will show the problem here in Bourne. Fast food wrappers, cartons and tins are everywhere while pizza packets have become a favourite throwaway in recent months and a walk around the streets on a Sunday morning will reveal at least half a dozen that have been chucked away the night before. Dog fouling and broken glass are also a problem and weeds in the street are not unknown to us either. At the time the survey was published, there were many examples in Bourne itself, around the traffic lights and the paved area outside the Burghley Arms and the Town Hall as well as many other places in the town centre, especially along West Street.
Vandalism and litter in public places demeans the entire town for it is seen by visitors who judge us accordingly. There are those who will say that they occur in all communities but that is not an acceptable excuse because many are striving to overcome it with some success. We too should try to improve our habits but merely accepting the status quo means no improvement to our environment which will sink further into the abyss of urban deprivation that can be found in our worst inner cities. Not only does our quality of life suffer but also our local economy because no one likes to shop in a town where such anti-social behaviour is so manifestly obvious.
These
trees, mountain ash saplings each about six feet tall, were planted by members of the Rotary Club of Bourne in the spring
of 2003 along the grass verges in North Road, a most attractive improvement to this thoroughfare which is also the main A15 trunk road and therefore the most frequently seen by people passing through. The trees, just coming into blossom, therefore
gave our town a most pleasing aspect and they were a delight to see.
On Saturday night,
May 3rd, vandals moved in and destroyed three of the saplings, breaking two of the stems completely while a third was wrenched from its support. Earlier, a fourth had been uprooted together with its securing post and dumped some distance away at the end of Mill Drove.
The final 24 trees planted by Rotarians as part of this project had been put in place by members only
a few days before and residents living in the vicinity offered refreshments to the men as they worked
as a gesture of appreciation. This
was the thanks they got from drunken louts rolling home full of
lager-fuelled bravado and intent on destroying anything in sight. The volunteers who put in so much time and effort to improve our town deserve better.

There was a similar trail of damage left along North Road shortly before
Christmas 2004. On the night of Saturday 18th December, ten trees along
the grass verge were destroyed, estate agents' signs smashed, a wire
security fence around a housing development site alongside Mill House torn
down, an electricity cable marker toppled and, in one of the most wanton
acts so far, a Royal Mail box uprooted. The damage to the trees was
becoming a regular occurrence and the wrecking of the mail box at the top
of Stephenson Way was particularly regrettable because it was put there to
serve the community and was particularly necessary at that time of the
year when the volume of mail is much heavier than usual. There were more
demands from the community for a police presence at this vulnerable spot,
especially at weekends, but nothing was done.

|

|
An old mattress
dumped in the Wellhead Field in April 2003 (left) and a shopping
trolley from one of the town's supermarkets thrown into St Peter's
Pool in May 2003. |
DAMAGE AT THE
WELLHEAD GARDENS |
 |
 |
In September 2005, vandals
turned their attention to the Wellhead Gardens where an ornamental
cherry tree was uprooted during the night with empty lager cans left
in the vicinity, a sign that the culprits had been drinking.
Elsewhere in the park, trees were damaged as foliage and branches
were ripped off, especially some of the older chestnuts. |
UPDATED SEPTEMBER 2005
See also Rubbish
Wherry's Lane
Sempringham
Go to:
Main Index Villages
Index
|